Case Studies

tribotech master white.png
TT_Case-Studies-Header_2000(W)-x-1250(H).jpg
 

Case Study 2 –

01.-WT-and-WT+-Master_CMYK.png
 

Location of Trial

Port Hedland

Client's Problem

Quick shell wear failures due to build-up in a high-wear area.

Roller Size

152Ø  x 538mm face width V-Return

Achieved Roller Life Previous to Trial

Steel rollers with a 40mm thick rubber lagging were used with an average roller life of 6 weeks

Trialled rollers

Weartech and Weartech+ Composite Rollers

Trial duration

4 months

 
Case-Studies_2.1.png

<
Weartech Rollers
after 4 months
of operation.

Case-Studies_2.2.png

<
Weartech+ Rollers
after 4 months
of operation.

Due to the large amount of build-up and wear in areas of the conveyor belt, the client chose to use 40mm thick rubber lagged rollers. However, the 40mm thick rubber lagged rollers were extremely heavy and needed to be replaced every 6 weeks due to excessive wear on the shell.

The client trialled both Weartech and Weartech+. Both Weartech products are 45% lighter and resulted in a significant increase in roller life as summarised below.

 
 
01.-WT-Master_CMYK.png
 
01.-WT+-Master_CMYK.png
 

Industry 40mm thick Rubber-Lagged Roller


Wear after 4 months

2.5mm out of 17mm
(17% of useful life)

1.5mm out of 17mm
(10% of useful life)

>40mm, Rollers
replaced twice

Estimated Roller Life

2 years

3 years

6 weeks

Weight

10 kg

10 kg

19 kg

Roller replacement after 3 years

1.5

1

26